This probably old news to all of y'all (and I'm aware that I'm also headed for "get off my lawn" territory) but I've been seeing the ghastly "TL; DR" show up more often in comment threads I read lately. Maybe it just means that I should return to my earlier policy of just never reading comments. I think what grates most is that it seems whenever I see TL; DR, it's been tossed at someone who aspired to write about a topic in a more thoughtful manner than the usual soundbite, short-attention-span-theater style that owns the internets. Really, I could go on and on about this (quelle surprise, right?) but Ta-Nehisi Coates said it better (and calmer and more rationally) when he noted that you don't have to comment on everything. Even on a site that you read every day, it's okay to skip a post. The world won't end if you're wisdom on Every Goddamn Thing isn't shared with the entire internets. Especially if that wisdom doesn't extend any further than TL; DR.
I was reading this article in the NYTimes this morning and it was fairly stupid. Not aggressively stupid but clearly a waste of time. It was supposed to be about the fact that there's a limit of 5000 on the number of friends you can have on Facebook and how some people are dealing with that. And that's about all the story. Repeated the fact from the headline. Told us that Facebook wouldn't say why there was a limit. Included lots of quips from celebrity types who are at or near the friends limit. And allowed the writer to make lots of snarky comments about the sort of people who waste time on Facebook (obviously meant to remind us that she was not the sort of person who wastes time on Facebook "updating" her "status" for her "friends.") Yeah, it was just that good.
Which raises the question: why did I read it? A perfectly reasonable question and one I'm not sure I've got the answer to just yet. I mean, I've spent enough time reading the NYTimes by now that I can spot what's likely to be a pretty stupid article just from the headline and blurb. Sure, you can say that by starting to read, I'm refusing to make a pre-judgement based on limited information. I'm being open to the possibility that something good might happen. Yeah, right. But, no... It might be the triumph of hope over experience. But I suspect it's more likely some sort of literary masochism. I read these things knowing they'll suck so that I can confirm my opinion of the debased state of journalism and newspaper writing in the early 21st century.
Sometimes I feel like the reason I got into DJing at XDU was to gain one more measure of control of the audio environment. I know that in today's webstreaming, iPod world, the notion of radio as a public audio space can seem a bit quaint. But I was reminded today that, quaint thought it may be, it's still a part of life. Had a dose of 80s classics over breakfast. Determined that Hall & Oates are less annoying than "Sussudio" and that it's a toss-up between "Paradise City" and "Who Can It Be Now?" Got another shot of dance hits at work later in the morning and determined that I don't really mind hearing "Like a Prayer" twice in one day, altho I would be just as happy not hearing it. Alas, while I was out of the room control of the audio space changed and when I returned it was no longer dance/pop hits radio but boomer classics. And I was reminded that I hate (hate!hate!!hate!!!) "American Pie." Srsly. It's on a short list of songs that seriously make me think about stabbing a pencil into my ear drum. That list would include "Stairway to Heaven" and anything from THE WALL. Probably other stuff too but those are the ones that come immediately to mind.
Top Chef finale! Yukon Cornelius vs. the Miser Brothers. I was planning to live blog the show but we managed to miracle into tonight's community dinner at Panciuto so I ended up overfull and unable to do any more than watch the show.
Spoilers below