I forgot to mention this earlier but there was actually something funny in the Sunday Times Magazine questions column last weekend. Normally it's just Deborah Solomon sounding like an ass. In fact, I've read that a couple of people (including Ira Glass) have accused her of editing their answers in a way that changed the meaning of what they'd said and of making up new questions to answers they'd given. Anyway, Sunday's subject was Umberto Eco. The high point of the interview was when he responded (ostensibly) to a question about the DaVinci Code by saying that Dan Brown was like a character from Foucault's Pendulum. First time I ever heard of DaVinci Code I remember thinking it sounded like Foucault's Pendulum for morons. But it never occurred to me that Brown actually was one of Eco's characters come to life.
and forced to wear party hats
Categories:
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Georg published on November 29, 2007 10:57 PM.
so long, it's been good to know you was the previous entry in this blog.
if it was moving, it'd be a parade is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- Durham (37)
- XDU (339)
- art carz (19)
- cookin (35)
- food geekery (112)
- fuh-fuh-fuh-fuh-fashion (3)
- futbol (20)
- hooray beer! (51)
- i call shenanigans on that (84)
- i should not know more about your religion than you do (1)
- la musica (160)
- looks at books (18)
- movies (77)
- ponzi scheme of stupid (16)
- science! (4)
- vegas, baby (33)
- whinging (13)
- writing (16)
Monthly Archives
- January 2012 (11)
- December 2011 (27)
- November 2011 (22)
- October 2011 (24)
- September 2011 (15)
- August 2011 (14)
- July 2011 (10)
- June 2011 (9)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (16)
- February 2011 (14)
- January 2011 (13)
- December 2010 (21)
- November 2010 (15)
- October 2010 (16)
- September 2010 (17)
- August 2010 (31)
- July 2010 (24)
- June 2010 (24)
- May 2010 (27)
- April 2010 (27)
- March 2010 (27)
- February 2010 (21)
- January 2010 (26)
- December 2009 (24)
- November 2009 (27)
- October 2009 (22)
- September 2009 (21)
- August 2009 (29)
- July 2009 (28)
- June 2009 (21)
- May 2009 (24)
- April 2009 (29)
- March 2009 (25)
- February 2009 (27)
- January 2009 (31)
- December 2008 (27)
- November 2008 (30)
- October 2008 (28)
- September 2008 (26)
- August 2008 (41)
- July 2008 (31)
- June 2008 (31)
- May 2008 (23)
- April 2008 (26)
- March 2008 (32)
- February 2008 (20)
- January 2008 (34)
- December 2007 (35)
- November 2007 (35)
- October 2007 (32)
- September 2007 (34)
- August 2007 (24)
- July 2007 (34)
- June 2007 (28)
- May 2007 (31)
- April 2007 (32)
- March 2007 (41)
- February 2007 (31)
- January 2007 (29)
- December 2006 (32)
- November 2006 (36)
- October 2006 (34)
- September 2006 (28)
- August 2006 (29)
- July 2006 (26)
- June 2006 (27)
- May 2006 (29)
- April 2006 (27)
- March 2006 (29)
- February 2006 (24)
- January 2006 (19)
- December 2005 (30)
- November 2005 (21)
- October 2005 (27)
- September 2005 (44)
- August 2005 (39)
- July 2005 (26)
- June 2005 (26)
- May 2005 (26)
- April 2005 (20)
- March 2005 (33)
- February 2005 (20)
- January 2005 (31)
- December 2004 (25)
- November 2004 (32)
- October 2004 (34)
- September 2004 (32)
- August 2004 (30)

I hadn't heard that about Solomon but it doesn't surprise me. I've read enough of her columns that basically go, "Question 1: you suck! Question 2: did I mention that you suck?" that I wonder why anyone agrees to do it anymore.
_DaVinci Code_ could be _Foucault's Pendulum_ for morons, but I think closer to the mark would be _Holy Blood, Holy Grail_ *written* by morons. :) I finally read _DC_ because I wanted to know what all the hubbub was about; it seemed like every single female on the singles' sites I was cruising was reading the damn thing. So I read it: (1) There were passages so jarringly bad that I was literally grinding my teeth. (2) Reading it did not help me find an SO, or even help me get laid. :)