and forced to wear party hats

| 2 Comments

I forgot to mention this earlier but there was actually something funny in the Sunday Times Magazine questions column last weekend. Normally it's just Deborah Solomon sounding like an ass. In fact, I've read that a couple of people (including Ira Glass) have accused her of editing their answers in a way that changed the meaning of what they'd said and of making up new questions to answers they'd given. Anyway, Sunday's subject was Umberto Eco. The high point of the interview was when he responded (ostensibly) to a question about the DaVinci Code by saying that Dan Brown was like a character from Foucault's Pendulum. First time I ever heard of DaVinci Code I remember thinking it sounded like Foucault's Pendulum for morons. But it never occurred to me that Brown actually was one of Eco's characters come to life.

2 Comments

I hadn't heard that about Solomon but it doesn't surprise me. I've read enough of her columns that basically go, "Question 1: you suck! Question 2: did I mention that you suck?" that I wonder why anyone agrees to do it anymore.

_DaVinci Code_ could be _Foucault's Pendulum_ for morons, but I think closer to the mark would be _Holy Blood, Holy Grail_ *written* by morons. :) I finally read _DC_ because I wanted to know what all the hubbub was about; it seemed like every single female on the singles' sites I was cruising was reading the damn thing. So I read it: (1) There were passages so jarringly bad that I was literally grinding my teeth. (2) Reading it did not help me find an SO, or even help me get laid. :)

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Georg published on November 29, 2007 10:57 PM.

so long, it's been good to know you was the previous entry in this blog.

if it was moving, it'd be a parade is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

Pages