So the NYTimes has apparently decided that David Byrne is cool again. They even reference Arcade Fire and the Quannum label in support. Either they're correct (see: stopped clock, twice a day) or else not only is Byrne not cool, but neither are Arcade Fire nor Quannum. Much as I hate to agree with NYTimes on any matters pop-cultural, I'll have to this time. Even tho they did mistakenly identify Luaka Bop as Byrne's label. (Not in this century, sparky)